|
No More MercuryWhat's new
In December 2005, the EPA announced a plan that will allow power plants to continue emitting high levels of toxic mercury into the air, despite the mountains of evidence that mercury harms human development. This decision is even more callous considering that the technology exists to cut mercury emissions by 90 percent from power plants, the largest source of mercury pollution in our environment. Scientific evidence shows that cutting mercury emissions would reduce levels of mercury in the environment and fish.
Brief summary
The principal way that people are exposed to mercury is by eating fish, a staple of our diet. Maine and 43 other states, the EPA, and the Food and Drug Administration have issued advisories warning people, especially women and children, to avoid or limit eating fish. Even with such warnings in place, the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention estimate that 1 out of 12 U.S. women of child-bearing age have unsafe levels of mercury in their blood. Loons and other wildlife that eat fish are also at risk from mercury poisoning. In fact, Maine's loons contain more mercury than loons in any other state. Mercury may disrupt their reproductive systems and make them more susceptible to disease, reducing the next generation and potentially thinning the overall population. We can't wait any longer to protect children and women from the dangers of mercury. Officials can, and should, take immediate action to nearly eliminate the mercury pollution that's spewing into our air from power plants. Two years ago, EPA's own scientists said current technologies could achieve a 90 percent reduction from power plants. The Bush administration should remove as much mercury from power plants as is technologically feasible.
Additional LinksMercury Policy Project NESCAUM - The Clean Air Association of Northeast States |