|
|
Clean Energy Reports
Search
•
RSS Feed
Executive Summary
America is at an energy crossroad. As a nation, we are dependent on
fossil fuels at a time of growing demand and dwindling supply.
Meanwhile, fossil fuel use continues to impose massive environmental
and economic costs. Now our country must choose between paying to
continue the status quo and investing in a new energy future.
The costs of continuing on our current energy path are steep.
American consumers and businesses already spend roughly $700 billion to
$1 trillion each year on coal, oil and natural gas, and suffer the
incalculable costs of pollution from fossil fuels through damage to our
health and environment. If America continues along a business-as-usual
energy path, U.S. fossil fuel spending is likely to grow, totaling an
estimated $23 trillion between 2010 and 2030.
Policymakers in Washington, D.C., and many states have recently
taken the first small steps toward a clean energy future, adopting
policies to encourage energy efficiency, ramp up the use of solar and
wind power, and curb global warming pollution. Now, with even bolder
steps – such as a national cap on global warming pollution and more
ambitious targets for renewable energy and energy efficiency – on the
public agenda, powerful interests with a stake in preserving the status
quo have criticized strong clean energy policies as being too expensive
for the American public.
In fact, the reverse is true. The United States cannot afford to
wait to break our dependence on fossil fuels. The cost of fossil fuels
to our economy and our environment will continue to mount in the years
to come unless the nation takes bold steps now to embrace the benefits
of a clean energy future.
America is overly reliant on fossil fuels such as coal, natural
gas and oil. This dependence is costly to everyday citizens, and sends
valuable dollars overseas and out of the domestic economy.
- The United States depends on fossil fuels for 85 percent of our energy supply.
- In 2006, American consumers and businesses spent $921 billion – or
close to 7 percent of America’s gross domestic product – on fossil
fuels, more than the nation spent on education or the military. In
2008, national expenditures on fossil fuels likely topped $1 trillion
for the first time ever. Each year, more than 70 percent of this money
is spent on oil.
- In 2007, America spent more than $360 billion importing fossil
fuels, with the vast majority of that money spent on crude oil. That
money is a direct transfer of wealth from American consumers to oil
companies and foreign governments.
- For every dollar that an American household spends each year, about
10 cents is likely to go toward the purchase of energy, with most of
that money spent on fossil fuels.
Fossil fuel production and use damage our environment and our
health – inflicting even greater damage on the American economy and our
quality of life.
- Fossil fuel combustion is the leading contributor to global
warming, which, in addition to being a looming environmental and human
catastrophe, could inflict massive economic damage as well:
- Sea level rise and an increase in the severity of storms could put
key cities such as New York, Miami and New Orleans at greater risk of
costly storm damage. A 2008 Natural Resources Defense Council study
estimated that high-intensity hurricanes could cause as much as $422
billion in damages in Atlantic and Gulf Coast states between 2025 and
2100.
- A 2007 study by researchers at the Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory and the Carnegie Institution at Stanford University found
that global production of three of the six largest global crops
experienced significant losses due to global warming between 1981 and
2002. The study concluded that global wheat growers, for example, lost
$2.6 billion and global corn growers lost $1.2 billion in 2002.
- Global warming is forecast to inflict a variety of other costs,
including declining rainfalls and rising temperatures that will combine
to cause large and extended drought conditions in regions like the
Southwest, and impacts on public health due to heat-related illnesses,
greater formation of ozone smog, and increases in vector-borne disease.
- An assessment by former World Bank Chief Economist Sir Nicholas
Stern indicates that global warming has the potential to reduce global
per-capita consumption by as much as 20 percent.
- Fossil fuel production and use also imposes other environmental and social costs besides those related to global warming.
- Fossil fuels are a leading source of air and water pollution. The
economic cost of air pollution in sectors regulated under the Clean Air
Act has been estimated at $9 trillion between 1970 and 2000, with costs
resulting from pollution-induced early mortality, illness, health care
costs and lost productivity.
- The production and transport of fossil fuels results in routine
pollution of the environment and occasional catastrophic accidents. The
December 2008 collapse of a coal ash pond outside a Tennessee Valley
Authority power plant covered 300 acres in sludge and will cost an
estimated $825 million to clean up. Between 1990 and 2006, 51 large oil
spills in the United States resulted in the expenditure of between $860
million and $1.1 billion in removal costs and compensation for damages.
The economic and environmental burden of fossil fuel dependence will only worsen in the years to come.
- The United States will spend an estimated $23 trillion on fossil
fuels between 2010 and 2030 should energy consumption and fossil fuel
prices follow U.S. government projections – an amount equivalent to
three years’ worth of income for the entire American workforce at
current earning rates.
- Fossil fuel expenditures will decline in the next several years due
to the lingering effects of the economic recession, but annual
expenditures of more than $1 trillion per year – which proved
devastating to the economy during early 2008 – will become the “new
normal” by the middle of the next decade. By 2030, the United States
can expect to spend approximately $360 billion more per year on fossil
fuels than we did in 2006.
- If fossil fuel prices are driven higher, faster, the United States
could expect to spend more than $30 trillion on fossil fuels between
2010 and 2030. Fossil fuel expenditures would again surpass $1 trillion
in 2011 and by 2030 we will be spending $750 billion more per year on
fossil fuels than the nation did in 2006.
- Oil prices are a main driver of higher expenditures. If oil prices
reach $200 per barrel by 2030 – an event more likely to happen as world
oil supplies become increasingly strained – the United States will be
spending $1.3 trillion out of $1.6 trillion total fossil fuel costs on
oil alone.
- Rising fossil fuel expenditures will affect all 50 states, but
states with a greater reliance on fossil fuels, particularly oil, will
experience greater increases. (See Appendix A for projected fossil fuel
expenditures for all 50 states.)
Investing in clean energy that never runs out can reap economic
savings. The United States has the ability today to produce this
energy, and to help Americans use energy more efficiently in their
homes, businesses and vehicles.
- A 2007 analysis by McKinsey & Company estimated that the United
States could reduce its emissions of global warming pollution by
approximately 1.2 billion metric tons of carbon dioxide per year (equal
to about 20 percent of today’s fossil fuel emissions) with net dollars
savings. In other words, these investments are economic winners on
their own terms – even excluding benefits for the environment, public
health and America’s security..
- A recent Energy Information Administration analysis of the American
Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) found that the Act’s provisions
for residential and commercial energy efficiency improvements will
yield significant savings. The EIA projects that the law will reduce
residential and commercial energy bills by $13 billion in 2020 and $21
billion in 2030.
- The recent move by President Obama to increase federal vehicle fuel
economy standards to 35 miles per gallon by 2016 will deliver $20
billion in net savings to consumers in 2020 at gasoline prices of $2.25
per gallon. If gasoline prices hit $4 per gallon, the net benefits
would balloon to $70 billion.
- According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, transitioning to a
clean energy economy could cut global warming emissions while saving
consumers and businesses $465 billion each year by 2030, with $1.7
trillion in net cumulative savings between 2010 and 2030.
The federal government, along with the states, should take actions to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. They should:
- Reduce the nation’s emissions of global warming pollutants
deeply enough to prevent dangerous impacts from global warming, guided
by the latest scientific understanding. The United States should
adopt an emissions cap and other policies that will reduce global
warming pollution by 35 percent below 2005 levels by 2020 and by 80
percent below 2005 levels by 2050, and implement strict rules for
carbon “offsets” to ensure that efforts to reduce emissions are
successful.
- Ensure that a cap-and-trade program used to achieve those
targets directs the revenues gained through the sale of allowances for
public purposes. One hundred percent of emission allowances should
be auctioned, with the revenues used for investments in clean energy
and to benefit consumers.
- Ensure that America generates at least 25 percent of its
electricity from renewable sources of energy such as wind and solar
power by 2025.
- Strengthen energy efficiency standards and codes for appliances and buildings,
with the goal of reducing energy consumption in new buildings by 50
percent by 2020 and ensuring that all new buildings use zero net energy
by 2030.
- Promote the development and implementation of clean transportation infrastructure,
including improving the fuel economy of light- and heavy-duty vehicles,
reducing the carbon intensity of transportation fuels, and promoting
plug-in vehicles, public transportation and high-speed intercity rail.
- Ramp up investment in solar power through tax credits, specific
targets in state renewable electricity standards, requirements for
“solar ready homes,” rebate programs, and other measures.
- End subsidies to fossil fuel industries.
|